Historic Building Condition Assessment &
Preservation Documentation

Architectural History · Documentation · Preservation Planning

Wartner Historic Preservation provides historic building condition assessments, architectural history research, and preservation planning services for public agencies, nonprofit stewards, and private owners

The firm brings over 18 years of international experience in historic preservation and architectural history, with work completed in Europe and the United States across a wide range of building types and periods

Selected work includes documentation and research for medieval religious complexes, early modern vernacular buildings, and nineteenth and early twentieth century structures


Mission

Wartner Historic Preservation works to support the long-term stewardship of historic buildings through careful documentation, research, and evaluation.

We believe that informed decision-making is essential to preservation. By providing clear, well-documented assessments and historical context, we help owners, agencies, and organizations understand the significance and condition of their historic resources and plan appropriate preservation actions.

Our work draws on European and U.S. preservation traditions and emphasizes accuracy, restraint, and respect for historic fabric.

Engagements are structured to support preservation decision-making at different stages, from early evaluation through high-risk determinations.

 

Types of Engagement


All engagements are time-bounded and scope-defined at the outset.

  • A focused, time-bounded evaluation of an existing historic structure to establish baseline condition, identify primary risks, and support early decision-making.

    This engagement is intended for situations where a full condition assessment is not yet warranted, but informed judgment is required to determine whether and how to proceed. Typical use cases include property acquisition, early project planning, grant feasibility, or prioritization among multiple resources.

    The assessment focuses on readily observable conditions, known vulnerabilities, and deterioration patterns that materially affect near-term decisions.

    Deliverables typically include:

        •    a concise written condition summary

        •    identification of critical issues and areas of concern

        •    photographic documentation

        •    high-level recommendations outlining reasonable next steps

    This engagement provides defensible early guidance. It does not replace a comprehensive condition assessment, nor does it include treatment design or project management.

  • A comprehensive, standards-based evaluation documenting existing conditions, assessing risks, and establishing a preservation-appropriate treatment framework for a historic structure.

    This engagement is appropriate when long-term stewardship decisions are required, when institutional accountability is involved, or when documentation must withstand regulatory, funding, or public review. Work is grounded in accepted preservation methodology and aligned with applicable standards.

    The assessment documents physical conditions systematically, evaluates deterioration mechanisms, and identifies character-defining features that inform treatment decisions. The resulting framework is intended to guide future planning rather than prescribe specific construction means and methods.

    Deliverables typically include:

        •    detailed physical description and condition assessment

        •    photographic documentation

        •    identification of character-defining features

        •    evaluation of deterioration causes and risks

        •    preservation-appropriate treatment framework aligned with applicable standards

    The final document is designed to remain valid beyond the immediate project phase and to support future planning, funding applications, regulatory review, and stewardship decisions.

  • An independent, judgment-based review addressing a specific preservation decision where risk, cost, or public scrutiny is high.

    This engagement is intended for defined decision points such as demolition versus repair determinations, scope validation, or review of proposed treatments for standards alignment. It is appropriate when conflicting opinions exist or when an impartial, defensible assessment is required.

    The review is limited to the question at hand and emphasizes clarity, risk identification, and standards-based reasoning rather than exhaustive documentation.

    Deliverables typically include:

        •    a targeted written opinion addressing the defined question

        •    standards-based analysis and rationale

        •    clear articulation of risks, constraints, and defensible options

    This service does not include design development, project management, or ongoing involvement. It is intended to support clear decision-making and reduce downstream risk.

 

Scope of Services

  • Historic Condition Assessments

  • Architectural History and Documentation

  • Assistance to Historic Preservation Commissions and Nonprofits

  • National Register Nominations

  • Local Historic Landmark Designations

  • Historical Research

    
    
    

Request an Assessment

Engagement type and scope are confirmed following an initial discussion

Marc Wartner
Histroic Preservation & Condition Assessment
Email: marc@mwpreservation.com
Phone 252.349.2001


 

Selected Professional Reference

“During an on-site review of a historic structure proposed for demolition, Marc Wartner identified that foundation displacement and wall separation issues, initially believed to require demolition, were in fact repairable. As a result, the structure was retained and is now undergoing rehabilitation rather than demolition.”


Matthew Shelly, New Bern, NC


 

Selected Contributions and Outcomes

  • Advanced understanding of early Gothic development in rural Baden-Württemberg through field research, documentation, and publication

  •  Initiated and supported ongoing research programs addressing early Gothic architectural chronology in Baden-Württemberg

  • Provided technical and historical guidance during restoration projects to support retention of significant historic fabric

  • Published peer-reviewed research and technical articles in Denkmalsanierung and related professional outlets

  • Contributed to the preservation of multiple historic buildings through documentation, survey, and stakeholder education

  • Established a U.S.-based preservation practice to continue professional work in architectural history and historic preservatio

  • Served as a Commissioner on the New Bern Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) for a three-year term

  • Currently serving as Principal Investigator with HistCorps, contributing to documentation and condition assessments for historic structures on public lands